Advertisement
From the description, it sounded like it was a discussion group for people who enjoy experiencing people in all their fullness, but aren't into Polyamory. A place to discuss fluid relationships. But after I get here, I find tons of poly posts and people looking for dates.
What is supposed to be going on here? cause it sure doesn't match the tribe description from what I've seen.
What is supposed to be going on here? cause it sure doesn't match the tribe description from what I've seen.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 7:20 AMAs far as I understand it this tribe is about any type of "fluid relationship", be it poly or mono or something else.
::shrugs::
There are "personals" type posts but I don't think anyone takes them very seriously, easy enough to skip over (if annoying, but hey, it's the internet, just about everywhere has something annoying *g*)
Anyhow, I guess my take on the tribe is that it's a place to discuss alternative relationship models and "love theory"
But that's just my take ;) -
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 10:15 AMAnyhow, I guess my take on the tribe is that it's a place to discuss alternative relationship models and "love theory"
That sounds fine to me. It's just that the first line of the tribe description did specifically state "did you read the Ethical Slut or look into Polyamory and find it wasn't for you?"
So, honestly, it bothers me there are so many polyamorists here. -
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 11:10 AMWell, what about it bothers you?
Is it the tendency for a lot of poly people to answer relationship questions with "Well, this wouldn't happen if you were poly" and such? Is it specifically because the description seems to exclude polyamory? (I say "seems to" because there isn't anything in the description of "fluid relationships" that would exclude poly, note, I'm talking about the two paragraphs after the examples of poly things that might turn one off to poly)
I know a lot of the threads talk about poly relationships but it's certainly not an exclusive thing. I'm sure there are a few (if not plenty, I've never done a head count *g*) mono's here and a few who don't hold to mono or poly.
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Sat, October 21, 2006 - 1:10 PMWhat I find interesting is the number of people who equate The Ethical Slut with polyamory when that is not exactly what the book is espousing (when you get into technicalities and definitions).
I think that there are people in this tribe who practice all kinds of different relationships because that is where they are on their paths. I think that saying, "You are 'x' so you don't belong here" is a bit against the overall theory of a fluid relationship tribe. Who gets to decide whether or not someone is "fluid enough" for this tribe?
-
-
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 11:09 AMMy guess, is Whatever We Make It To Be.... on the Net, you ARE what you post.... -
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 11:12 AMComing from the "hierarchically-organized" poly relationships perspective, "fluid" relationships are "non-hierarchically organized" non-monogamous relationships.
In other words, people who aren't monogamous, but also don't use a "primary/secondary" model to organize or structure their relationship(s). -
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Thu, October 12, 2006 - 1:25 PMI'm new here, but I have to agree with Linda. Any group is what the participants make of it--and things are always changing... so, I guess this is a doubly fluid tribe! :)
Having said that, Spartaca's comments really ring true for me.
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Sun, October 22, 2006 - 5:05 PMI like your comments. Mostly because the only way I can make sense of polyamory is what you said. To me, polyamory is having a committed relationship with more than one person. And only because of my past experience with past people who call themselves poly, anything other than the definition I gave, to me at least, just sounds like people who like to sleep around a lot and use a term to make an excuse for their behavior.
My assessment may seem fair or unfair depending on who you are and how you describe yourself, but coming from a person who has been fucked over by men that call themselves poly, that is my take on it. sorry. -
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Mon, October 23, 2006 - 12:20 AMAh yes, finally stepping off the other million things in my world to say a few things about this tribe.
I created this tribe about two years ago because, as the description says so well, I found that the Ethical Slut and the other books on polyamory didn't quite fit both what I had been looking for in a relationship and what I seemed to notice in the communities of neo-pagan-tribal-hippy-freaks around me. They seemed to flow in and out of relationship like water from one pond to another, like going from dance partner to dance partner as the songs went by. And I was struck by the beauty of this, the apparent elegance of the dance of relationship they were in. Of course, I evetually found out that, like most relationships, there was always bit that weren't so pretty, but the model stuck with me, and I decided to see if it would be possible to create such a thing as a "fluid relationship".
So what is a fluid relationship? Spartaca's post was pretty close to hitting the nail. Basically, it is not any one type of relationship, and it is all of them. A fluid relationship is a bit of a "meta" relationship, one that can handle monogamy, polyamory, open relationships, and all the shades in between. At it's very core is a deep understanding of what moves you and what moves your partner, and developing a deeply conscious dance that follow both your movements perfectly. As such, it isn't one thing at all times, but it can be one thing for extended periods of time. Really, a fluid relationship is one that constantly strives for the perfect balance between both partners, much like contact improv is about creating a constant balance of weight and movement between partners. For a FL, the dance is energetic, however, and the senses that need to be developed are all about "feeling where your partner is" emotionally, psychologically, spiritually, etc, rather than physically. Fluid relationships are about allowing what arises in the moment between two partners, and having them serve the relationship as well as letting it serves them.
Esoteric stuff, no doubt. But when one starts to feel a relationship as a living organic being or in terms of a dance, a whole new universe opens up, and the health or elegance of the relationship starts to make a lot more sense.
Paget and I have been in such a relationship for the last two years, and what we have found is that it makes the most sense for us. It means that sometime we can be in an open relationship, sometimes something more polyamorous emerges, and sometimes we just feel like, for all intended purposes, to be monogamous. But it is clear that our relationship moves and grows, and it is clear that others see that and approach us differently as it becomes more mature. The respect, the consciousness, the honor that others -- lovers, friends, family -- communicate with us with is often surprising. And, there is often also a gross lack of the same from others. But would they do this if they really knew it doesn't serve us and our relationship? So we continue to communicate about her, tell others the name we have given her two years ago, for we find that it gives them something to hold on to.
We called her Afthonia, greek for abundance.
So we're not saying you should all go around naming your relationship (although it certainly was fun for us). What we are saying, though, is that the way we found to be better at this dance is to dive deep into who you are and who your partner(s) is/are, find out what moves them, what their "shit" is ('cause we all have some), and see if you can truly dance with them, with elegance, with grace, with that zen you sometimes find in the middle of a song you love while dancing wildly under the stars!
A bientot et avec amour,
Philippe & Paget
and our little community of two we call Afthonia
-
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Mon, October 23, 2006 - 12:18 PMWow, Phillippe, it's been *2 years* already? Congrats! I like your concepts of your relationship.
I see people get so hung-up on words, definitions, semantics, really.... and I think they're missing the point.
THE POINT is love and intimacy and healing..... and NOT saying "OH you are too slutty for us.... so you don't belong here, you belong THERE!!"
So what if I love a woman or a man or 10 men or no men? So what if I use different orifices, toys, or flavors of ice cream (as in, are you Vanilla or Kinky?) The point is the ENERGY or SPIRIT behind it all.... the words are just dress, just code to make cloudy concepts more concrete.....
Concrete? "It's not MY fault, it's the asphalt!" That is overdoing the concrete.... get it? Ha, ha, ha!
Fluid relationships.... sounds a lot like an Ocean, a Lake, a River....
Aftonia..... a f t o n i a.... did I spell it right?
Phillippe, apparently you get the concept that a relationship is an ENTITY, that it is MORE than the sum of the two lovers involved..... There's YOU, and then there's PAGET, and then there's AFTONIA, which is what you both choose to name your Relationship.
Always, there is energy behind words! And there's energy behind touch, behind sex, behind all conversations, including typed ones online......
I think of a Relationship entity as an Angel.... they appear to my psychic vision as some composite of me and the person I've just made love with in DreamTime.... at least, if we've both had orgasms...... Aleister Crowley speaks of this in his magick texts, also, I believe.... though I don't study Crowley or Thelema, Jimmy Page does so seriously.
-
-
Re: What exactly is this tribe?
Sat, November 25, 2006 - 7:05 PMMama, I'm confused by your perspective:
Why does someone who dates/sleeps around need to use use polyamoury label
as an excuse?
A slut is a slut , not that there is anything wrong with that!
But it sounds like maybe you need to be sure you are getting
involved with someone who is ETHICAL and HONEST,
whether that be with whatever label.
Personally, I've met as many lie-ing cheating supposed monogamists,
to make poly guys and girls look like scouts
(which is GOOD since I have a scout fetish).
-
-
-
-
Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Sun, October 29, 2006 - 11:40 PMA ~lohA Beloveds ....
.... well ... it appears that somehow i got linked to your .... oh ... yes ... the description of the TRIBE :: fluid relationships ... aka Sparticus ... in Fuzzyʻs Link .... or was it profile? ... anyway interesting and compelling dialogue going on aboust here ... yet was unable to comment unless i joined .... hmmmm interesting dynamic ..... and i truthfullly like the sound of as well as :: the "vision" ..... which i envision the "the vision ...... as it resonates personally..... as an opportunity to "go with the flow" which addresses.::: (for me) ... the opportunity to be open to whatever // whomever // opportunity the omni~multi~yoni verse seeks to align me with in the moment ... However ....and though Fluffyʻs description and response is eloquent and and seems to have a pretty sturdy foundation in his own primary (?) relationship .... yet as one who has struggled with watching more than a few men suffer and struggle with their dualing affections for me ...to endure the "invitation" to schedule "visitation" ( for lack of a better word in this moment) .... to see my beautiful brotherʻs trying to figure out how to logistically, psychologically ... and with integiry .... schedule me into there live ::: yes, one M W F ... and the other volunteered to the S T Th .... as part of the compromise ... as i asked of them ::: "when do i have tyme to schedule myself in? .....
Thank fully i have learned to see the signs..... early on of boundaries being breached .... often with no harm or malice .... Yet .... Fluffy might be the only brother whom i have met that could profess to the terms contained in "fluid relationshipsʻ ... and not go out of his mind when i was exercise my dualing autonomy ....Incuding autonomously@msn.com .... i mean how much more autonomous do you get ? ..... anyway .... more power to the those who can pull it off ... i have yet to experience anything that remotely resembles a "fluid" relationship and not see my other primary or secondary lover go insane ..... and // or hurting them deeply ..... (temperment all inclusive) .... so .... as i am all about soveriegnty and freedom i invite all those who may have any knowledge or "ancient secrets" that can prevent the human heart from breaking ... and having to witness it in those otherʻs whom you true~ly love and cherish ..... i can no longer find resonance with the reality no matter how reasonable and beautiful it seems in concept .... of course we all want to see the best for the oneʻs we love... love is not fostered behind cages ... yet when the one(s) you love so dearly..... breaking..... it is difficult to imagine "fluid relationships" ) as defined) realized and affective in reality ........ Or at least in my past and future reality ..... aaaah with the exception of "menage a trois .... which is alwayz a good tyme to be had .... if the boundaries are clear ... yet does this in fact fall into the category of a "fluid relationship"....
Because if someone out there has a download for me re:: how not to watch otherʻs suffer and suffer yourself .... please bring it on .....
Drop the Bombs .... to me ... cause i am all ears ....
ALWAYZ LOVE .....
Sat Nam
~ * ~
sheilah -
-
Re: Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Mon, October 30, 2006 - 1:56 AM.... oh yes in the naming of your "relationship endeavour" as an entitety .... one of abundance ... i believe is a very clever way to lay the foundation for the entitety to be one of a living, growing .... moving forward ... ie :: dynamic force .... which is crucial .... as relationships whether fluid or "stationary" .... become hopelessly lost to the void of lost love when individuals "forget" the vision and vibration that brought
them together on a path of "co~creation" .... and rather than sharing the love // vision /// our spreading the
"collective light" generated by their "combined energies " ... it is of course an ideal that i would like to put forth on my manifestation "list" ... however ... all to often .... more often than not ... those who remain in "long term relationships" .... speaking once more of myself ... pretty "loyal and "monogamous" to categorize ... yet clearly supportive of triad endeavours (and even as long term ventures .... decreasing the potentiallity of dualism occuring .... in itʻs most potent form..... ) ... however the tendency to reach a comfort zone ... or one where "the other" is intentionally or inadvertantly doing so .... it is clear from an outside observer (and how iʻve learned to break these ones down poste hasteʻ) ... that there appears to be a common thread winding these scenarios together ... co~dependancy, enabling the "other" one ( love is blind so to speak) ... and not alwayz finding encouragement from your primary partner to expand your vision and potentiality for growth... and her iʻm not just referrig to personal growth ... i speak more directly to the "soulʻs purpose" growth which is the only reason i can find to support and engage in the endless ebb and flow that we either learn to embrace with joy or go crazy trying to "fight it" ....
And as i have not met you in the 3d FUZZY ... nor your love interest .... or primary partner interest ..... i am not quite ready nor prepared to come from a place of objectivity in your own situation ... which it appears to be quite extra~ordinary and i give you my complete respect and gratitude for sharing your vision and the manifestation in relationship .... Intention is everything ... yet some are so unclear as to their own "feelings" or are so out of touch with them .... that perhaps a little more insight would be beneficial for all ....
And again ... i welcome any downloadz from the "fluid relationships" tribe as to how i may find a way to integrate what seems most natural to me .... as remaining with the same partner for years in a monogamous relationship .... while it certainly has itʻs bennies .... has historically turned out for me to end in jealous rages and resentment over control issues .... and i travel within a pretty conscious community .... in fact i did find your home page by visiting Vʻs .... and noticed many of my most beautiful mirrors in your cyber~ tribe images list ....
So.... i welcome any feedback ... please feel free to kinnex w/ me directly as i belong to so many "tribes" ... i could spend endless hours delving into the specific replies.... etc..... of which may be spent more productively for me .... in the pursuit of expediting my exodus from this country to the Ancient Landz East :: Kingdom of Siam ... and then onto Bali .... sooner than later ... and most definetely BEFORE winterʻs chill descends fully upon these landz ....
May your heart be filled with RAINBOW LIGHT on your journey home ~ * ~
ALWAYZ LOVE
Sat Nam
~ * ~
sheiiah -
-
Unsu...
Re: Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Mon, October 30, 2006 - 12:02 PMnamaste,
i love that there are so many options of lovestyles in the OPEN these days, so that all of us are no longer freaks, but so many people who just are doing whatever we want with honesty!
i consider myself polyamorous, because my intent and my heart's way is not to be monoamorous and love only one person, but to love many people at the same time, but in my case, without hierarchal descriptions of where people stand, everyone is my lover and we all know how we connect, altho i only live w/ my kids, so we don't have that type of arrangement to maybe, in a few poly's cases, dictate roles.
altho maybe it is more fluid in that way, basically i have any number of lovers but the idea is to love and see how that goes. we somewhat come and go, it is more like we all have other lovers so it is more like a matter of time management or maybe someone does end up spending a bunch of time with someone else. then also there are those moments like i had recently where i had to groove on new energy until i had absorbed him into me in a way that i could work back into an existing relationship, hard to explain.
so i think a poly person could be fluid, yes.
unfortunately there are people who say they are poly, but are somewhat confused of what that means to other polys. it is not cheating, esp if you have the intent in life to have one love. it can mean sharing, open relationships, fluid, etc....
pretty loosey-goosey is how i generally work it, and i like that.
xo
beki -
-
Re: Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Mon, October 30, 2006 - 12:36 PMBeki-
"unfortunately there are people who say they are poly, but are somewhat confused of what that means to other polys. it is not cheating, esp if you have the intent in life to have one love. it can mean sharing, open relationships, fluid, etc.... "
You said a mouthful.
It's painful to watch some polys try to squeeze others into boxes.
It's also painful to watch some polys disrespect other polys' agreements.
Either way, it really pays to establish what poly means to you, *especially* when dealing with other poly-identified people. -
-
Re: Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Mon, October 30, 2006 - 1:12 PMsheiiah,
the written word seems so... inadequate, to convey the vision, and even after I share and share and share, the words only seem to carry a small bit of what I truly see is possible for all of us.
what does it take to have a great relationship? for me, it is willingness, skill and experience. or desire, ability and capacity. different words, same perspective.
but more speficically, what does that look like? it looks like having a strong vision/intention, it looks like having strong integrity, an impeccable word, incredible reliability, something that others can count on no matter what, so that when they fall short, the absolutely have no choice but to take responsibility. it looks like having compassion and forgiveness for yourself and others such that we you or they fall short, that everyone gets to get back on their feet and continue to move forward towards the vision. and it take perseverance: the deep desire to see things through, to find the promised land, to see the vision realized, and knowing there will be many falls and mistakes and wrong turns along the way, and knowing that this is how relationships grow. that the growing pains we feel are simply nothing more than our letting go of attachment such that we may reach and embody and fulfill our dream. and to realize that the pains *are* part of the relationship, as much as the joys. there is no "getting" there, just the journey, although there are often places of "arrival", which show up again and again.
one of my teachers once said to me that the purpose of relationships is growth. another said that it is karma which brings us together, such that we get to play things out and get rid of this karma.
and thus we grow.
yes, words often fall short. but that does not stop us from trying, finding new ways to express ourselves, new ways to communicate.
but really, the meeting in 3d is so much better. let's.
a bientot et avec amour,
philippe
-
Unsu...
Re: Spreading the LOVE ..... Sharing the VISION ~ * ~
Tue, October 31, 2006 - 9:22 AMnamaste,
good points everyone, yes.
disrespect is definately painful. as people live their live with more love rather than fear, and in more self-love, it becomes easier to honor what other people want, are, and agree to. i have definately had to learn and experience this, and it is good to know up front what people stand for, and if you like that, can be in that, feel the love with them, or not. it's def cool to be with people who you can groove on similarly in that way.
i def was raised in the american monogamous framework, and even tho i always felt poly, i did not know about it, i thought that people could not have more than one love at a time, who was doing that? so i went ahead and got married and did all that regular mono life. but now after divorce, i am def poly, but have had lovely fluid relationships too. growing up, only bad girls would have had fluid or poly relationships, or even had sex anyone other than the person who called you a slut who wanted a clean person. i sure hope sex is more positive for teens+. yikes.
yes, i think right now we are the next wave of free love, freedom to invent our love, after the 60s.
xo
beki -
-
here's an exerpt
Sat, November 25, 2006 - 7:17 PMI think the relationship assumptions we grow up with severely limit our capacity for community, connection and intimacy. For me it's important that sex is not the capstone or crux of a relationship.
I've found myself unable to happily participate in anything resembling a traditional relationship. I could not get out from underneath the baggage, the unconscious assumptions of our society. I struggle to forge new relationship territory.
I think that traditional relationship models suck. They are unhealthy, patriarchal, possesive, based on control.I have judgements about the monogamous pair bonding. It seems so hetero, even when queer people do it. It seems isolating. It means that a person's energy gets nearly exclusively invested in one person. I think this is neither healthy nor effective.
-
-
-
-
-